punwitch:

palindromiclove:

punwitch:

palindromiclove:

palindromiclove:

punwitch:

palindromiclove:

demisnowflake:

punwitch:

Cis people are so gullible. A doctor basically gave a quick glance at your junk before you were even old enough to communicate and you think that’s the best gauge of your gender? Sad.

[disregard…

Ok but I’m talking about the original post. Because I’m not trans in any way whatsoever that automatically makes me stupid and inferior? I disagree.

I just said you were gullible. I mean I have you ever challenged the idea that your genitals determine your sex and then your gender?

Have you ever challenged the idea of sex? Have you ever explored your gender?

Or did you just roll with it?

Food for thought :)

Gullible is completely the wrong word to be using. I have lived with myself for 21 years & I know who I am and what I want.
 Of course I’ve thought about what it would be like to be involved romantically or sexually with random people (who hasn’t?), and I have no desire to be with another woman. That doesn’t make me gullible, it makes me self-aware and straight

It may be more accurate to say that it’s “sad” when people don’t consider other things and live the life society tells them to live, and aren’t happy.

But if they are happy, or if they have considered other ways of life but know they don’t want that, I would not say that is “gullible” and “sad”. I just feel the original post was being too generic and broad, and really just rude.

You’ve already displayed that you have zero idea what we’re talking about here so how can you say you aren’t gullible?

Hint: we’re not talking about who you take on as romantic partners, we’re talking about your gender and where it comes from lmao. Do you even know what cis means?????

Well shit, sorry I didn’t want to type an entire essay explaining who I am to you, a random person on tumblr dot com. I used romantic partners as a one-paragraph example. Excuse me for that.

I know what cis means - I know what all your labels mean, and I think they’re stupid. I’m not the person who believes everyone needs to slap labels on everything. I’m the person that believes everyone should do whatever the fuck they want and not be required to explain it to everyone they meet and just be happy with it.

And I literally don’t even care what your reply is because I’m not even following you, I don’t know you, and after a couple minutes on your blog I don’t have any desire to. I know who I am, I know what makes me happy, and I don’t feel the need to explain that to anyone, much less you. I don’t know why you feel you know everyone else’s lives better than they do. Have fun with your blog and your gender-questioning and whatnot.

zexotic:

palindromiclove:

zexotic:

having the best hair day ever. wearing my favorite shirt (feat. side boob). but im spending my night on tumblr. classic

side boob is life

also I’m pretty sure every day is a good hair day for you

i fucking miss you. god dammit

Same, I’ve been thinking about you lately just wondering how things are going :( Miss youuu :(

angizzoli:

justadashofsarcasm:

deluxetoaster:

can we start a club for teenagers who were constantly complimented on their intelligence when they were younger and are now having trouble coping with the realization that they’re actually of average intellect at best

can this club have a support person that helps us to study because we didn’t need to before so we don’t know how to now 

This is so my life that’s hurt

sharkchunks:

metalheadadam:

pimpinchilton:

commanderabutt:

shadow1423:

commanderabutt:

spaff-der-kegel-doer:

historynet:

seen on my face book feed(Anti-vaccination, modern)

"studies"

who has ever thought this ever

Don’t let your children drink water it might make them think drinking other clear liquids is okay do you want your child drinking bleach

don’t let your children walk, it might make them think its okay to walk away from home

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure not even people who use heroin believe it is beneficial.

Don’t let your child breathe air. Studies have shown thatin the event of a fire, children who breathe in air are much more likely to breathe in smoke than children who’ve never breathed air.

Don’t have a child. 100% of children grow up and die. You’re literally condemning your own children to die.

sharkchunks:

metalheadadam:

pimpinchilton:

commanderabutt:

shadow1423:

commanderabutt:

spaff-der-kegel-doer:

historynet:

seen on my face book feed(Anti-vaccination, modern)

"studies"

who has ever thought this ever

Don’t let your children drink water it might make them think drinking other clear liquids is okay do you want your child drinking bleach

don’t let your children walk, it might make them think its okay to walk away from home

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure not even people who use heroin believe it is beneficial.

Don’t let your child breathe air. Studies have shown thatin the event of a fire, children who breathe in air are much more likely to breathe in smoke than children who’ve never breathed air.

Don’t have a child. 100% of children grow up and die. You’re literally condemning your own children to die.

futureconflicted:

marlbororedgirl:

pulpnonfic:

stephiejae:

becausejensenackles:

ectobling:

in 6 years its going to be the 20s again so we can bring back swing music and the aesthetics of that era but keep modern values who’s with me

I’m in.

As long as we don’t repeat the Hitler gaining control and shit part cuz I heard that was pretty lame.

but the titantic sank in 1912 and the costa concordia sank in 2012 and history is totally repeating itself

World War 1 began in july 1914…

well shit

ambalzarini:

Old lady: Can you cash a $100 bill and give me all singles because I’m going to bingo and…
Me: Nooooo. Baaaaaank.

No cashier in any store that exists has 100 singles in their till I’m willing to bet money on that fact.

oh no i would NOT bet money on that. I’ve had shit tons of $1’s before and even if I didn’t have 100 I could give you like 70 and you could get the rest from someone else and I’d be so happy that I didn’t have to deal with that stack of ones anymore, they’re so annoying.

I always have so many that I can’t even put more in and whenever I try to take one out like 8 fall out because they’re all jammed in there

carnivaloftherandom:

socimages:

Nope!
Brain studies find that concern for justice and equality is linked to logic, not emotion.
By Lisa Wade, PhD
A new study finds that people with high “justice sensitivity” are using logic, not emotions.  Subjects were put in a fMRI machine, one that measures ongoing brain activity and shown videos of people acting kindly or cruelly toward a homeless person.
Some respondents reacted more strongly than others — hence the high versus low justice sensitivity — and an analysis of the high sensitivity individuals’ brain activity showed that they were processing the images in the parts of the brain where logic and rationality live.   “Individuals who are sensitive to justice and fairness do not seem to be emotionally driven,” explained one of the scientists, “Rather, they are cognitively driven.”
Activists aren’t angry, they reasonably object to unjust circumstances that they understand all too well.
Image borrowed from Jamie Keiles at Teenagerie, who is a high sensitivity individual.
Lisa Wade is a professor of sociology at Occidental College and the author of Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions, with Myra Marx Ferree. You can follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

Auto-reblog.

carnivaloftherandom:

socimages:

Nope!

Brain studies find that concern for justice and equality is linked to logic, not emotion.

By Lisa Wade, PhD

A new study finds that people with high “justice sensitivity” are using logic, not emotions.  Subjects were put in a fMRI machine, one that measures ongoing brain activity and shown videos of people acting kindly or cruelly toward a homeless person.

Some respondents reacted more strongly than others — hence the high versus low justice sensitivity — and an analysis of the high sensitivity individuals’ brain activity showed that they were processing the images in the parts of the brain where logic and rationality live.   “Individuals who are sensitive to justice and fairness do not seem to be emotionally driven,” explained one of the scientists, “Rather, they are cognitively driven.”

Activists aren’t angry, they reasonably object to unjust circumstances that they understand all too well.

Image borrowed from Jamie Keiles at Teenagerie, who is a high sensitivity individual.

Lisa Wade is a professor of sociology at Occidental College and the author of Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions, with Myra Marx Ferree. You can follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

Auto-reblog.

midnightharry:

jackanthonyfernandez:

fuckyeahlavernecox:

Laverne Cox corrects Gayle King on CBS

Gayle King is such an ass that’s so rude she really said “blah blah blah”??

no she didnt this gif set is very misleading bc it makes it seem like the interviewer said this maliciously when in reality it was her making an honest mistake and laverne politely corrects her so

she didn’t even say “blah blah blah”…that’s just something added to the gif which is bullshit.